On June 7, 2014 in Las Vegas,
Jerad and Amanda Miller murdered two police officers in a pizza restaurant and
killed a bystander in a Walmart before Jerad Miller was killed by police and
Amanda Miller shot herself in the head. As usual, the zombie collectivist
mainstream media looked to blame entire groups of innocents for the actions of
two murderers. Progressive anti-constitutionalists blamed
the NRA and sought to use these horrific crimes as yet another excuse to
violate the natural right of Americans to bear arms. Others blamed the
supposedly fringe political
beliefs that the Millers held. The collectivist logic of such progressive
totalitarians is that if one person who holds Tea Party beliefs, reveres the
Constitution, listens to Alex Jones, believes in so called “conspiracy
theories,” and mistrusts the federal government, then all who do so are equally
guilty. Guilt by association. If one gun owner commits a murder, then all gun
owners are murderers. If one person who espouses the views of the Patriot
Movement commits a murder, then all Patriots do.
Of course, to be consistent, this
would have to go both ways. Under this collectivist approach, if one person of
any kind commits a murder, then every token of that type is guilty of murder. All
Muslims are guilty of the 9/11 attacks. All Christians are guilty of the
Centennial Olympic Park bombing. All Jews are guilty of the King
David Hotel
bombing. All blacks are guilty of the crimes of the Zebra Killers. All Germans
are guilty of the crimes of Hitler. All Russians are guilty of the crimes of
Stalin. All Italians are guilty of the crimes of Mussolini. All Chinese are
guilty of the crimes of Mao. All Japanese are guilty of the crimes of Tojo. All
Cubans are guilty of the crimes of Castro. In the end, everyone should be seen
as guilty. Perhaps everyone should be rounded up by the DHS under the NDAA and
thrown in Gitmo. Or perhaps we should just focus on the individuals who commit
crimes and hold them accountable instead.
One angle that has not received
much attention is the fact that the Millers were inspired to commit their
crimes because they saw their victims as oppressors.
This merits attention. It is not to say that Officer Igor Soldo or Officer Alyn
Beck were oppressors. By all accounts they were honest and hard-working
officers. However, there is no doubt that there are constantly countless high
profile examples of stories of law enforcement officers in all levels of
American government who are oppressive. Whether it is Albuquerque police killing
a homeless man, a Pittsburgh police officer punching a woman at a parade, or
a Memphis police office stealing
a Make-A-Wish Foundation gift from a terminally ill three-year-old child, there
is no shortage of corrupt and oppressive law enforcement officers. Each and
every time that some rogue cop commits a crime or abuses his or her power, it
creates the potential for blowback that could cause honest police officers such
as Officer Igor Soldo or Officer Alyn Beck or innocent civilian bystanders such
as Joseph Wilcox to be put in harm’s way.
While the responsibility for
crimes lies with those who perpetrate them, corrupt cops are guilty of
exacerbating the risk of crimes against law enforcement. There are many
disgruntled and unstable people like Jerad and Amanda Miller who may be like
tinderboxes. Incidents of police corruption and police brutality create
blowback that makes it much more likely that such individuals will act out in
violent ways. This line of thinking differs greatly from scapegoating movies,
songs, books, video games, or any other form of free speech. While human beings
have a natural right to produce a violent movie, a song with provocative
lyrics, a book with revolutionary ideas, a violent first person shooter video
game, etc., there is no natural right for a police officer to commit crimes or
abuse his or her authority.
Timothy McVeigh was set off by
abuses of federal law enforcement authority at Waco
and Ruby Ridge. While McVeigh and Nichols were responsible for their own
actions, the federal officers involved in those incidents provided important
causal links. Perhaps if Waco and
Ruby Ridge were handled better and casualties were avoided, the atrocity in Oklahoma
City would never have taken place. Unfortunately, in
the eyes of statists, the government can never possibly be a causal factor in
any negative consequences. Only private sector entities that they do not like
could possibly be.
No comments:
Post a Comment