Libertarian Republican Senator
and 2016 presidential contender Rand Paul of Kentucky
recently gave a speech
on civil liberties at California’s
notoriously liberal Berkeley. This
prompts the question of why college liberals have not become libertarians. The
Obama neo-progressives in the Democratic Party are on the wrong side of most
issues that traditionally liberal college students care about.
1. War
College students in the United
States have traditionally been anti-war. It
was, of course, the universities and colleges of this nation which spearheaded
the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War. Despite having been strangely—and
prematurely—awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, President Obama is not a man of peace.
He has continued the War on Terror which he inherited from President George W.
Bush. In fact, President Obama has escalated wars. He has continued the
Afghanistan War. He sought unsuccessfully to continue the Iraq
occupation, thwarting only by Iraq’s
refusal to grant blanket immunity to American troops. President Obama has also
waged war—er, “kinetic military action”—against Libya,
conducted a bloody drone campaign in Afghanistan,
Pakistan, and Yemen,
and zealously attempted to gin up a war with Syria.
If traditionally liberal college students are still anti-war, then
libertarianism with its axiom of non-aggression and its non-interventionism is
the true doctrine of peace.
Perhaps the fact that there is
not an active military draft is the reason that college students have seemingly
become apathetic about war. If they cannot be drafted and their friends and
relatives cannot be drafted, then perhaps it does not matter to them anymore.
If volunteers are instead risking their lives in these wars, then maybe most
college students just do not care. Though one would hope that these students do
care about the innocent people who are suffering due to President Obama’s
warmongering zeal. With the exception of President Jimmy Carter and
unsuccessful candidates such as Eugene McCarthy, the Democratic Party has been
a bloodthirsty war party since President Woodrow Wilson. It is unclear why
college peaceniks have supported the progressive cause for so long given this
violent streak of the party.
2. Civil liberties
Libertarians are champions of the
Bill of Rights. While college students mostly seem to be indifferent to the
Second Amendment, they have traditionally cared a lot about the First and
Fourth Amendments. Libertarians like Senator Rand Paul support Constitutional
rights over the growing despotism of the state. In contrast, President Obama
smiles like a villain as he allows the NSA and other American spy agencies to
violate the privacy rights of Americans and treat them like they are all
criminals. The Democratic Party has long since stopped being the champion of
civil liberties. So why do college students continue to support the party? Is
it because President Obama is allegedly cool? Was he cool when he wore his “dad
jeans” when throwing out a first pitch at a baseball game? Is he cool when
he is on the golf course like any typical square politician? Is he cool when he
allows the NSA to spy on everyone’s communications?
3. Drugs
It is no secret that many college
students like to smoke an occasional bowl—or bong— of Mary Jane. Even those
liberal college students who do not use drugs tend to disagree with the War on
Drugs. Libertarians favor ending drug prohibition. The Democrats have had ample
opportunity to end the War on Drugs, but they never do. President Obama has the
power to pardon every single nonviolent drug offender languishing in federal
prison. He has not. How can college students support a party whose leadership
is okay with throwing people in cages like animals simply for using or selling
drugs? Do they believe that these individuals deserve to be put in cages with
murderers simply because they choose to use or sell substances which are like
prescription drugs, alcohol, or cigarettes in many ways yet are not approved of
by the powers that be? Do these college students believe that drug offenders
should suffer just because the alcohol, tobacco, and pharmaceutical industries
do not want the added competition? Really?
4. Race
Liberal college students have
long opposed racism. “Color blindness” when it comes to race relations has long
been practiced by these students. Just because the leader of the Democratic
Party is black, it does not mean that the party is not racist. Continuing to
prosecute the War on Drugs—which disproportionately harms minorities—should be
evidence enough that the Democratic Party is racist. If it is not enough
evidence, then the welfare state should provide more than enough evidence. The
idea of the welfare state—as well as related programs like affirmative
action—is that blacks and other racial minorities are not equal to whites. They
simply cannot compete. Welfare programs make racial minorities and everyone
else enrolled in the programs into dependent wards of the state. If these
programs worked, then one would not expect poverty rates to be so high among
blacks, Hispanics, and American Indians. The truth is that these programs do
not work. Most likely, they were never intended to work. They were intended to
make obedient and dependent citizens who will not dare question authority. In
that regard, these programs are a success.
Libertarians, in contrast,
support free market and economic opportunity. They support the due process
clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment. They defend the natural rights of
human beings regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, gender, age, etc. The
same is true regarding gay rights. Libertarians do not believe that it is the
business of government to worry about, let alone discriminate against, people
on the basis of their sexual orientation. The Democrats, in contrast, have only
recently begrudgingly begun to support gay rights.
5. Economics
College students are inevitably
anxious about their economic futures. They often carry a lot of debt for their
educations. Student loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, so it is often
imperative that college students be able to get well paying jobs to support
themselves and pay for their loans. President Obama’s Neo-Progressive Democrats
are crony capitalists who support the status quo. As long as their friends on
Wall Street and in the “Green” sector do well, they care not about anyone else.
In fact, the more people who fail economically, the more people who go onto
welfare. The more people who are on welfare, the more people who are dependent
on the government. Economic failure creates more potential voters who will
support the Democratic Party.
Libertarians, on the other hand,
favor ending the Federal Reserve, cutting government spending, cutting taxes,
and cutting federal business regulations. These things will promote the growth
of the economy. If college students want a bright economic future, then why are
they not libertarians?
No comments:
Post a Comment