Democrats and Republicans are
partisanly divided over the issue of voter ID laws. Whether or not a potential
voter must present identification in order to vote, and if so, what forms of
identification are acceptable, varies from
state to state. Thirty states have enacted some form of voter ID law for the
alleged purpose of preventing voter fraud.
Some claim that voter ID laws
serve to disenfranchise minorities and the poor. President Obama has recently
claimed that voter rights are threatened
by voter ID laws. According to a study
conducted by NYU’s Brennan Center,
11% of voting-age citizens (21 million) lack necessary photo ID. A disproportionate number of
these Americans lacking photo ID are low income, racial and ethnic minorities,
and the elderly. Many of these people cannot afford the fees associated with
obtaining a photo ID. Some Americans—particularly elderly rural blacks—do not
have a birth certificate and sometimes lack the means to acquire one in order
to be eligible to receive a photo ID.
Those who support voter ID laws
do so because they claim voter fraud is a significant danger. However, there is
little evidence that voter fraud has been a widespread problem in American
elections. For example, a 2007
analysis done by The New York Times
found that there were only 120 cases of voter fraud filed in five years by the Department
of Justice, and these resulted in only 86 convictions.
One need not be a cynic to view
much of this as what it really is. Part of it is clearly a ploy by desperate
RINOs to disenfranchise votes that are more likely to go to Democratic rivals.
Instead of staying true to conservative principles and seeking to attract
non-traditional Republicans to the conservative cause, RINOs simply wish to
shrink the voting pool. This will not work for long, and will eventually just
lead to the demise of the GOP. If Republicans want to ensure that voter fraud
does not occur, why not in addition to voter ID laws, fund and staff programs
to ensure that every adult American has an acceptable form of ID? The fact is
that many Republicans want to disenfranchise Democratic voters and many want to
have the issue to use as red meat to energize its conservative base.
However, Democrats are equally
guilty here. Coming up with a national or state-by-state strategy in which
citizens lacking a photo ID could be aided financially and logistically to
obtain one would not be particularly difficult or costly. The federal
government and the state governments clearly waste taxpayer money on nonsense,
so certainly some bored and lazy government workers and the necessary funds
could be found to make this a reality. The truth is that the Democrats do not
want those without photo ID to be empowered. They want these people to be
dependent upon the government in general and upon the Democratic Party in
particular. The Democrats want to have the race card to play as red meat for
their base. The best way to prevent alleged racists from disenfranchising poor
minority voters without photo IDs would be to help these voters get photo IDs.
Yet, year after year, this does not happen.
Even if cases of voter ID
prosecuted are rare, this does not mean that voter fraud is not a problem. Even
if no cases are ever prosecuted, this does not mean that voter fraud does not
occur. Even the possibility of voter fraud is unacceptable if it can be
prevented. Democracy does not mean merely that periodically there is an
election and people vote. Many nations have elections, but many of these
nations are not even close to being true democratic republics. Consider Afghanistan
and Iraq.
Between candidates and parties being barred from running, crooked criminals and
American puppets running, violence intimidating voters, and fraudulent
practices, neither of these nations is likely to have a truly fair and
democratic election anytime soon. American elections need to be kept as clean
and fair as possible. There is often only a razor’s edge between a true
democratic republic and a banana republic with bogus elections.
While the Constitution does not explicitly guarantee citizens a right to vote, it is obvious that such a right would be covered by the Ninth Amendment. Thus, in an important sense, denying eligible voters the ability to vote due to voter ID laws without ensuring that they can easily obtain the required type of ID is a violation of a natural right.
While the Constitution does not explicitly guarantee citizens a right to vote, it is obvious that such a right would be covered by the Ninth Amendment. Thus, in an important sense, denying eligible voters the ability to vote due to voter ID laws without ensuring that they can easily obtain the required type of ID is a violation of a natural right.
This controversy is easily
solved. Institute programs within the states to ensure that all American adults
have photo IDs. Then institute and enforce voter ID laws. How difficult is
this? Instead, despite the fact that there is generally so little relevant
difference between the major American political parties, the Republicans and
Democrats feel the need to play games and use the issue for propaganda
purposes. This is yet another reason why mainstream American politics needs to
change.
No comments:
Post a Comment